6 Comments
User's avatar
Financial Frost's avatar

Strong point. Investors often treat financial strength as if it automatically makes the investment strong too — but the company and the investment can diverge much earlier than people expect.

The Inside Analyst's avatar

I agree, a good business is not automatically a good investment case. What is surprising in Adyen’s case is that the balance sheet (including debt and cash) is strong while the operating segment begins to look fragile. That will ultimately determine the direction of the stock and limit further upside.

CM Capital Research's avatar

I just wrote about it too. I don’t really see it weakening rather it should benefit from scale. Margins should expand a bit still, but valuation anywhere in the 15-20x is likely around fair value

The Inside Analyst's avatar

You are right, it is an early stage assessment. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with Adyen as overall levels are still exceptional, however, we can see some weakening in the margins and RoE paired with a deceleration of growth. Trend matters here and it will be interesting to see how the metrics evolve.

ScuzzaMan's avatar

Since you mentioned acquisition behaviour, are you talking about customer acquisition costs or M&A behaviour?

Because in some respects they're the same thing and in others quite distinct. Both can be done badly and destroy value rather than multiply it.

The Inside Analyst's avatar

Thanks for leaving a comment! I was referring to M&A behavior here. Generally, Adyen shows a strong balance sheet with weakening operating metrics. That alone requires some monitoring. However, management is disciplined with regards to M&A activity at this stage which provides some support. You are right, both forms of acquisition can destroy value.